Record Detail

At the end of 2014, China introduced new specialist intellectual property (IP) courts. Although China had IP tribunals within the People’s Courts, the reform to establish separate IP courts was touted as a significant step in establishing the rule
of law in the governance of IPRs in China. This is not surprising considering that an independent judiciary is central to the rule of law. This institution affirms and enforces private rights, as well as providing necessary impartiality in the process of
decision-making among peer institutions. China has recently undergone several legislative reforms which amend substantive IP law. It is not surprising that this was followed by both administrative and judicial reforms. Introducing a specialized
court with exclusive jurisdiction will likely affect other institutions with similar competences, e.g. general courts or dministrative tribunals. Institutional choices significantly affect the outcome of decision-making because the processes of
decision-making differ and will involve different stakeholders. Often, institutions move together and a change in one of them is likely to cause a change in another, even without explicit efforts to effect such changes. Therefore, any institutional reform project needs to reflect measures to contain or coordinate unintended consequences or impacts on other institutions resulting from such changes. This paper places Chinese specialized courts in a global context. We will first describe the
function of a specialized IP court from a comparative institutional perspective. Next, we place the Chinese specialized IP courts in the context of the national administration- driven IP strategy to highlight the Chinese characteristics. In its analysis this paper explores whether the perspective of institutional comparison may be applied