APA Style
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, Vol. 111, No. 3, September 2010, No. Klas SER 617.05 ORA o:Comparison of the efficacy of conventional radiography, digital radiography and ultrasound in diagnosing periapical lesions. (2010).
New York:
Elsevier Inc.
Chicago Style
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, Vol. 111, No. 3, September 2010, No. Klas SER 617.05 ORA o:Comparison of the efficacy of conventional radiography, digital radiography and ultrasound in diagnosing periapical lesions.
.
New York:
Elsevier Inc,
2010.
Text.
MLA Style
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, Vol. 111, No. 3, September 2010, No. Klas SER 617.05 ORA o:Comparison of the efficacy of conventional radiography, digital radiography and ultrasound in diagnosing periapical lesions.
.
New York:
Elsevier Inc,
2010.
Text.
Turabian Style
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, Vol. 111, No. 3, September 2010, No. Klas SER 617.05 ORA o:Comparison of the efficacy of conventional radiography, digital radiography and ultrasound in diagnosing periapical lesions.
New York:
Elsevier Inc,
2010.
Print.