This paper analyzes argument formation in Nuosu Yi, a language that is
typologically unusual in having classifiers as well as a definite determiner. Also
unusual is the fact that demonstratives do not combine directly with nouns in this
language but require the mediation of classifiers. Properties such as these are shown
to pose a challenge to current accounts of argument formation. The Neocarlsonian
approach of Chierchia (Nat Lang Semant 6:339–405, 1998) explains the absence of
definite articles in classifier languages as resulting from considerations of economy.
If nouns in classifier languages are names of kinds, they can occur directly as
arguments of verbs, thereby obviating the need for extra structure to host a determiner.
The data from Nuosu Yi alters the empirical generalization and calls for a
modification of the explanation. The specific account of Nuosu Yi that is presented
bears on current discussions about the nature of argument formation. Must arguments
necessarily occur with overt or covert determiners or is it possible for
languages to differ in this respect? Must bare nominal arguments necessarily denote
kinds or can they denote properties? In this sense, the discovery of a new type of
classifier language contributes to a theory of language variation and argument
formation in general.

EB00000002553K

Available

• Definiteness in Nuosu Yi and the theory of argument formation