Arbitration agreements are currently an internationall much disputed topic. Especially the validity of sports arbitration agreements has been under review by academics in the aftermath of the Pechstein case in Germany However, to date no English court has explicitly examined the validity of sports arbitration agreements on the grounds of the structural imbalance between athletes and sports federations. This article takes a step in that direction and considers whether principles of English law should render sports arbitration agreements invalid. It, therefore, analyses the legal doctrines of restraint of trade
duress, undue influence, unconscionable bargain and public policy. It concludes that none of these doctrines invalidate
sports arbitration agreements per se. Nevertheless, other than the issues analysed in this article, English courts would also need to consider the particular arbitral tribunal’s procedural rules, as well as competition law and art. 6 ECHR.

EB00000004252K

Available